JOURNAL ARTICLE

The ultrasonographic "whirlpool sign" in testicular torsion: valuable tool or waste of valuable time? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jared McDowall, Ahmed Adam, Louis Gerber, Callistus O A Enyuma, Sunday J Aigbodion, Sean Buchanan, Abdullah E Laher
Emergency Radiology 2018, 25 (3): 281-292
29335899

PURPOSE: A positive whirlpool sign (WS) is defined as the presence of a spiral-like pattern when the spermatic cord is assessed during ultrasonography (US), using standard, high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) and/or color Doppler sonography (CDS), in the presence of testicular torsion. The objective of this review was to assess the validity and accuracy of this sign by performing a comprehensive systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed (August, 2017), using the following databases: BMJ Best Practice, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Selected studies were further assessed for relevance and quality using the Oxford 2010 Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP).

RESULTS: Of the studies assessed, a total of 723 participants were included, with a mean of 72.3 (SD 71.9) participants. Of the participants, 226 (31.3%) were diagnosed with testicular torsion (TT). Meta-analysis of the studies that provided sufficient data resulted in a pooled sensitivity and specificity of the WS of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65-0.79) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99), respectively. Removal of all neonates increased the pooled sensitivity to 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70-0.98) while the pooled specificity remained almost unchanged at 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00). The estimated summary effect of all studies with sufficient data was 4.34 (95% CI, 1.01-7.67; n = 394; p = 0.001). A large degree of heterogeneity was suggested by an I2 statistic of 88.27% (95% CI, 68.60-98.68%). Removal of neonatal subjects increased the estimated summary effect to 5.32 (95% CI, 1.59-9.05; n = 375; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION: The WS, when correctly diagnosed, may be viewed as a very definitive sign for TT in the pediatric and adult populations. However, its role in neonates is limited.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
29335899
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.