Inter-rater reliability in the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS)

Lisa Langton, Adam Bonfield, Damian Roland
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2018, 103 (5): 458-462

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the level of inter-rater reliability between nursing staff for the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS).

DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.

SETTING: Single-centre paediatric emergency department.

PARTICIPANTS: 12 participants from a convenience sample of 21 nursing staff.

INTERVENTIONS: Participants were shown video footage of three pre-recorded paediatric assessments and asked to record their own POPS for each child. The participants were blinded to the original, in-person POPS. Further data were gathered in the form of a questionnaire to determine the level of training and experience the candidate had using the POPS score prior to undertaking this study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater reliability among participants scoring of the POPS.

RESULTS: Overall kappa value for case 1 was 0.74 (95% CI 0.605 to 0.865), case 2 was 1 (perfect agreement) and case 3 was 0.66 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.744).

CONCLUSION: This study suggests there is good inter-rater reliability between different nurses' use of POPS in assessing sick children in the emergency department.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article


You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.


Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"