Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Factors affecting compliance with confirmatory colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test in a national colorectal screening program.

Cancer 2018 March 2
BACKGROUND: Screening with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is effective in reducing deaths from colorectal cancer (CRC). Since 2004, biennial FIT screening has been available to a target population in Taiwan as a national screening program. The objective of the current study was to identify the factors that influence willingness to undergo a confirmatory colonoscopy after a positive FIT, because related references in the published literature were scarce.

METHODS: A semistructured questionnaire was based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) and a literature review. A stratified, random sampling method was used to recruit participants who had a positive FIT from all cities/counties in Taiwan. Cross-sectional, computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted in 2012, and the results were analyzed using a logistic regression model that took into account population demographics, core content of the HBM, and HBM-modifying variables.

RESULTS: In total, 2807 respondents were included in the analysis. The completion rate was 50%. Multivariate analyses revealed that higher perceived threat (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-2.01), higher cues for action (aOR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.68-1.82), lower perceived barriers (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.42) and higher health behavior scores (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.60) were associated with a greater willingness to participate in confirmatory colonoscopy. Participants who were older (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98) or unmarried (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92) were less likely to participate in verification.

CONCLUSIONS: The government could improve the screening rate by training case managers to assist in following patients until they complete colonoscopy, subsidizing sedated colonoscopies, and providing health education not only to the general public but also to physicians. Cancer 2018;124:907-15. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app