Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Functional outcome after calcaneus fractures: a comparison between polytrauma patients and isolated fractures.

Injury 2017 November
BACKGROUND: Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) can have long-term consequences in terms of foot pain and disability. This injury frequently occurs in the context of polytrauma patients and its influence in long-term functional prognosis is well known. The purpose of this study is to compare the etiology, severity, and functional outcome of the operated DIACFs between polytrauma patients and isolated cases.

METHODS: Eighty-six patients with operated displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were managed at our institution between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2015. Eighty patients completed the follow-up, nine of them with both calcaneus operated (89 calcaneus) by ORIF with a plate. Two groups were established; one included 11 (14%) polytrauma patients, three of them with operated bilateral calcaneus, and 69 (86%) patients without polytrauma diagnosis. Severity of trauma, injury patterns, psychiatric background, associated fractures, second surgeries and functional questionnaire (adjusted American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society - AOFAS - ankle-hindfoot scale and SF-36) were collected. A detailed comparative statistical analysis is provided.

RESULTS: There was significant statistical relationship between polytrauma patients and those with psychiatric comorbidities, severe trauma or severe injury, but not with second surgeries, later subtalar arthrodesis or outcome measures. Only calcaneal fractures with comminution according to Sanders classification was associated with second surgeries and later subtalar arthrodesis. The AOFAS score was solely related to trauma severity (71.5 vs 77; p = 0.29) and calcaneal fracture's comminution according to Sanders classification (79.4 type II and 79.3 type III vs 69.2 type IV; p = 0.000 and p = 0.008, respectively) and SF-36 score only with trauma severity (67.4 vs 78.1; p = 0.00) and psychiatric comorbidities (62.2 vs 75.8; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION: No differences in outcome measures and second surgeries were found between polytrauma patients and isolated fractures. For DIACFs, the severity of the impact was correlated with a higher number of second surgeries and worse functional outcomes. Following a DIACF, patients with psychiatric comorbidities presented worse health-related quality of life than people without this background.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app