Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Right ventricular outflow tract reintervention after primary tetralogy of Fallot repair in neonates and young infants.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes following primary tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair in neonates and young infants with pulmonary stenosis (PS) and pulmonary atresia and compare differences in reintervention on the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) among those undergoing valve sparing repair (VSR), transannular RVOT patch (TAP), and right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) conduit surgeries.

METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively in 101 patients who underwent TOF repair over a 10-year period between January 2005 and September 2015. The primary endpoint was reintervention on the RVOT, defined as a surgical procedure or cardiac catheterization-based RVOT reintervention.

RESULTS: Forty-three patients had TOF/PS, of whom 24 (56%) underwent TAP and 19 (44%) underwent VSR. Fifty-eight patients had TOF/PA, 14 (24%) underwent TAP and 44 (76%) underwent RV-PA conduit repair. Overall patient mortality was 2.9% (3 of 101). Thirty-three patients underwent surgical reintervention, and 52 underwent catheterization-based reintervention. Patients with TOF/PA who underwent RV-PA conduit repair had a higher surgical reintervention rate than those who underwent TAP (45% vs 21%). Patients with TOF/PSs undergoing VSR with a lower median birth weight (2.5 kg vs 3.7 kg) required more surgical reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal TOF repair can be performed with low mortality but frequent RVOT reinterventions. Surgical reintervention is earlier and the rate is higher among patients with TOF/PA undergoing RV-PA conduit repair compared with those undergoing TAP. Although there were no overall differences in RVOT reintervention rate between patients with TOF/PS undergoing VSR and those undergoing TAP, a lower birth weight in the patients undergoing VSR is associated with a higher surgical reintervention rate.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app