We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Prophylactic Therapy of Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome in Children: Comparison of Amitriptyline and Cyproheptadine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
American Journal of Gastroenterology 2018 January
OBJECTIVES: Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of nausea and vomiting. There is no definite treatment for the condition, although some medications are recommended. We aimed to compare the efficacy of amitriptyline and cyproheptadine in prophylactic therapy of CVS.
METHODS: This is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted during 2015-2016 in Isfahan, Iran. Sixty-four children who were 3-15 years old, with a diagnosis of CVS (based on Rome III criteria), were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups of amitriptyline and cyproheptadine. They were followed for 6 months, looking for frequency and duration of attacks as the primary outcome.
RESULTS: The mean monthly frequency of attacks in the last 2 months of the study in the amitriptyline and cyproheptadine group were 0.38±0.55 and 0.59±0.71, respectively (P-value=0.197), after intervention. The mean duration of attacks between amitriptyline and cyproheptadine group were 1.41±2.86 and 1.81±2.22 h, respectively (P-value=0.212). In the amitriptyline group 65.6% of patients reported 100% remission, whereas in the cyproheptadine group 50% reported full remission (P-value=0.206).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no superiority of one of the medications over the other. We did not find any age-related effect on the efficacy of these medications as well.
METHODS: This is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted during 2015-2016 in Isfahan, Iran. Sixty-four children who were 3-15 years old, with a diagnosis of CVS (based on Rome III criteria), were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups of amitriptyline and cyproheptadine. They were followed for 6 months, looking for frequency and duration of attacks as the primary outcome.
RESULTS: The mean monthly frequency of attacks in the last 2 months of the study in the amitriptyline and cyproheptadine group were 0.38±0.55 and 0.59±0.71, respectively (P-value=0.197), after intervention. The mean duration of attacks between amitriptyline and cyproheptadine group were 1.41±2.86 and 1.81±2.22 h, respectively (P-value=0.212). In the amitriptyline group 65.6% of patients reported 100% remission, whereas in the cyproheptadine group 50% reported full remission (P-value=0.206).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no superiority of one of the medications over the other. We did not find any age-related effect on the efficacy of these medications as well.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Demystifying normal-anion-gap metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, aetiology, evaluation and diagnosis.Internal Medicine Journal 2024 July
Evolving Treatment Strategies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review.Curēus 2024 December
Point-of-care ultrasound in Gastroenterology and Hepatology.Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2025 January 8
Nutritional Support in the ICU.BMJ : British Medical Journal 2025 January 2
Elective peri-operative management of adults taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a multidisciplinary consensus statement: A consensus statement from the Association of Anaesthetists, Association of British Clinical Diabetologists, British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society, Centre for Perioperative Care, Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia and UK Clinical Pharmacy Association.Anaesthesia 2025 January 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app