Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Is survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Saudi patients different from that of Western patients?

BACKGROUND: Although radical cystectomy (RC) is considered the gold standard treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer, nearly half of patients develop metastases and ultimately die within 2 years.

OBJECTIVE: To assess survival, evaluate different prognostic factors that may affect disease-free survival (DFS) in Saudi patients after RC for carcinoma of the bladder and to compare our results with those of Western countries.

DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.

SETTING: A tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data on patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer in the period between 1979 and 2014. Demographic, clinical and pathological variables and the application of perioperative chemotherapy were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done with DFS as the end point.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Disease-specific survival.

RESULTS: On 328 patients for whom data was available, the median follow up was 23 months (range, 2 month-28 years) and median age was 58 years (range, 21-90). Of these patients, 268 were males (81.7%), 235 (71.7%) had urothelial carcinoma (UC), 79 (24.1%) had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 208 (63.4%) had pathological tumor stage 3 or more. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and DFS were 52% and 48%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in DFS of patients with UC and pure SCC. On univariate analysis, lymph node status and pathological tumor stage were significant predictors of DFS. Both variables sustained statistical significance in a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION: Survival following RC is almost the same as others. Moreover, pathological tumor stage and lymph node metastasis were the only independent predictors for survival following RC. Future cooperative prospective studies are required to gain data on our region.

LIMITATIONS: Relatively small sample size and retrospective.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app