Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function.

Journal of Phonetics 2016 November
This study examined individual differences in categorical perception and the use of multiple acoustic cues in the perception of the stop voicing contrast. Goals were to investigate whether gradiency of speech perception was related to listeners' differential sensitivity to acoustic cues and to individual differences in executive function. The experiment included two speech perception tasks (visual analogue scaling [VAS] and anticipatory eye movement [AEM]) administered to 30 English-speaking adults in two separate experimental sessions. Stimuli were a /ta/ to /da/ continuum that systematically varied VOT and f0. Findings were that some listeners had a more gradient pattern of responses on the VAS task; the listeners who had a gradient response pattern on the VAS task also showed more sensitivity to f0 on the AEM task. The patterns were consistent across individuals tested on two separate occasions. These results suggest that variability in how categorically listeners perceive speech sounds is consistent and systematic within individuals.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app