MENU ▼
Read by QxMD icon Read
search
OPEN IN READ APP
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Voice Symptom Scale (I-VoiSS)

F Mozzanica, C Robotti, D Ginocchio, C Bulgheroni, R Lorusso, M Behlau, A Schindler, F Ottaviani
Journal of Voice 2017, 31 (6): 773.e1-773.e10
28262500

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Italian Voice Symptom Scale (I-VoiSS).

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, nonrandomized, prospective study with controls.

METHODS: The study consisted of five phases: item generation, reliability analysis, normative data generation, validity and responsiveness analysis. A group of 113 dysphonic patients was enrolled for the internal consistency analysis. Seventy-three of them completed the I-VoiSS twice, 2 weeks apart, for test-retest reliability analysis. A group of 150 vocally healthy participants completed the I-VoiSS for normative data generation. I-VoiSS scores obtained by dysphonic and vocally healthy participants were compared for validity analysis. I-VoiSS scores were correlated with those of the Italian version of the Voice Handicap Index (I-VHI) in 49 dysphonic patients for criterion validity analysis. I-VoiSS scores obtained in a group of 37 nonsmoker dysphonic patients before and after surgical treatment for vocal fold polyps were compared for responsiveness analysis. Finally, the cutoff value of the I-VoiSS was calculated.

RESULTS: All the enrolled participants managed to complete the I-VoiSS autonomously. Internal consistency and test-retest were satisfactory (α = 0.92 and r = 0.91). A significant difference in the I-VoiSS scores between the dysphonic and vocally healthy participants was found (p = 0.001). Positive significant correlations were found between I-VoiSS and I-VHI scores (r = 0.85). I-VoiSS scores obtained in the pretreatment condition were significantly higher than those obtained after surgery (p = 0.001). The cutoff value of I-VoiSS was 15.5.

CONCLUSION: I-VoiSS is reliable, valid, responsive to changes, and recommended for clinical practice and outcome research.

Comments

You need to log in or sign up for an account to be able to comment.

No comments yet, be the first to post one!

Related Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
28262500
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"