The surgical management of malrotation: A Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons survey.

PURPOSE: Some surgeries are now performed almost exclusively via a laparoscopic approach to enhance recovery and reduce postoperative complications. This survey explored institutional and individual physician practice patterns of the surgical management of malrotation.

METHODS: All 2015 Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons annual meeting attendees were invited to complete an anonymous prepiloted survey. Descriptive statistics were calculated.

RESULTS: The response rate was 35% (150 distributed, 52 returned). Most institutions (39.5%) saw on average 5-10 cases of malrotation per year. Most respondents (54.2%) indicated that the laparoscopic (LL) and open Ladd's (OL) procedures were equal surgical approaches for stable patients. Respondents were nearly equally divided (47.9% yes; 44.7% no) with respect to whether an LL procedure led to a higher risk of postoperative volvulus. Of those who answered yes, most indicated that an increased risk of postoperative volvulus was because of an inadequate widening of mesentery (45.8%), reduced "beneficial" postoperative adhesions (29.2%), or both (16.7%). 100% of respondents who perform an OL as their standard procedure indicated that there was a higher risk of postoperative volvulus with LL procedure. Only 1/8 who performed a LL as a standard approach routinely performed an appendectomy.

CONCLUSION: There remain polarized views on the best surgical approach to malrotation yet a persistent belief in the reduction in postoperative adhesions in leading to a postoperative volvulus with LL procedures. Collaboration to permit long-term follow-up of a large cohort may help develop guidelines for the operative management of malrotation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.