Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Augmentation of the Nipples Reconstructed with Modified Top-Hat Flap Using Dermal Grafts in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Nipple reconstruction in implant-based breast reconstruction remains challenging, as the remaining thin skin envelope results in a less projected neo-nipple with a reduced volume. This study presents a modified top-hat flap technique with rolled dermal grafts from the dog-ears of lateral wings for augmenting reconstructed nipples during implant-based breast reconstruction.

METHODS: Between April 2011 and December 2014, among 34 patients who underwent immediate post-mastectomy reconstruction with a direct silicone implant, nipple reconstruction was performed using the modified top-hat flap technique in only 21 patients (group A), whereas 13 patients underwent the modified top-hat flap technique with rolled dermal grafts from the dog-ears of lateral wings (group B). The projection and width of the neo-nipple were measured at the time of surgery and at 1 year post-surgery, respectively.

RESULTS: All modified top-hat flaps were successful without any complications. The mean nipple projections at the time of surgery were 0.75 ± 0.107 cm (range 0.5-0.9 cm) and 1.29 ± 0.064 cm (range 1.2-1.4 cm) in groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean nipple widths at the time of surgery were 0.90 ± 0.184 cm (range 0.6-1.2 cm) and 1.43 ± 0.076 cm (range 1.3-1.5 cm) in groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.001). The maintenance of nipple projection and width was significantly increased in group B compared with group A.

CONCLUSION: The modified top-hat flap technique with rolled dermal grafts from the dog-ears of lateral wings is a useful and easy method to expand and augment the volume of reconstructed nipples in implant-based breast reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app