[Registration of assessments in orthopaedic residents' portfolios is falling short].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate of the number of registered competency assessments in the portfolios of orthopaedic residents in the Netherlands, for whom a competency-based training programme is mandatory.

DESIGN: National cohort study.

METHOD: We collected data regarding the registered assessments of all orthopaedic residents who finished their training between 2012-2015. We determined the number of registered assessments of 'standard orthopaedic treatments' (evaluating residents' competency in 70 different orthopaedic treatments), objective structured clinical skills evaluations (OSCEs), critically appraised topics (CATs), and 360 degree feedback appraisals. We compared the number of registered assessments in the portfolios with the minimum requirements laid down by the training curriculum.

RESULTS: A total of 196 residents finished their training between 2012 and 2015. These residents finished their training with a mean (i.e., percentage of minimally required number of assessments) of 17.0 (34%) 'standard orthopaedic treatments' (level 4 or 5), 13.6 (34%) OSCEs, 2.6 (33%) CATs and 0.2 (4%) 360 degree feedback.

CONCLUSION: On average, only one-third of the minimally required number of assessments were registered in the portfolios of orthopaedic residents (OSCEs and standard orthopaedic treatments level 4 or 5). These revelations show that action is needed to improve the way in which the progress of residents is monitored. These findings are going to have an effect on the new curriculum which must be more practical and less complex. Additionally, external quality control will focus more on residents at the end of their training and on the training region involved. This information may serve as a framework for postgraduate training programmes in other scientific associations which also find themselves in the same process of modernisation.