COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Intestinal Malrotation and Volvulus in Neonates: Laparoscopy Versus Open Laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal malrotations with midgut volvulus are surgical emergencies that can lead to life-threatening intestinal necrosis. This study evaluates the feasibility and the outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of midgut volvulus compared with classic open Ladd's procedure in neonates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all neonates with diagnosis of malrotation and volvulus, who underwent surgery between January 1993 and January 2014, were reviewed. We considered the group of neonates laparoscopically treated (Group A, n = 20) and we compared it with an equal number of neonates treated with the classical open Ladd's procedure (Group B, n = 20).

RESULTS: The median age at surgery was 8.4 days and the mean weight was 3.340 kg. The suspicion of volvulus was documented by plain abdominal radiograph, upper gastrointestinal contrast study, and/or ultrasound scanning of the mesenteric vessels. All the patients were treated according to the Ladd's procedure. Conversion to an open procedure was necessary in 25% of the patients. The mean operative time was 80 minutes (28-190 minutes) in Group A and 61 minutes (40-130 minutes) in Group B (P = .04). The median time to full diet (P = .02) and hospital stay (P = .04) was better in Group A. Rehospitalization because of recurrence of occlusive symptoms occurred in 30% of patients in Group A (n = 6) and in 40% of patients in Group B (n = 8). Among these, all the 6 patients of Group A underwent redo surgery for additional division of Ladd's bands or debridement; instead in Group B, 4 of 8 patients underwent open redo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic exploration is the procedure of choice in case of suspicion of intestinal malrotation and volvulus. Laparoscopic treatment is feasible and safe even in neonatal age without additional risks compared with classical open Ladd's procedure.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app