We have located links that may give you full text access.
Supine position and REM dependence in obstructive sleep apnea : Critical model considerations.
HNO 2017 January
BACKGROUND: When considering supine position and REM dependence, many studies refer to the traditional definition in which obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity is at least doubled in the corresponding position/sleep stage (Cartwright index). The lack of consideration of the time spent in that particular sleep situation can lead to clinical bias.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with at least moderate OSA were analyzed retrospectively for anthropometric associations and correlations with OSA severity. One group consisted of 48 patients diagnosed using a polygraph, and the other group of 222 patients underwent polysomnography. First, the conventional Cartwright index was used, and a modified index was later applied to integrate the relative time component for REM sleep and the supine position.
RESULTS: Less than a fifth of the patients fulfilled the classic conditions for supine position or REM sleep dependency. There were no definitive cut-offs in the classic or modified Cartwright index with regard to daytime sleepiness. Both indices show there was a correlation between OSA severity and being overweight.
CONCLUSION: The modified Cartwright index allowed us to identify borderline cases that were characterized by a very low or high amount of time spent in the supine position or REM sleep situation. Therapy effects that could have been biased only by varying amounts of time spent in the supine position could be better controlled for. Future studies will possibly include various other ratios besides the previously accepted 2:1 ratio when different statistical parameters are considered, such as the reduction of OSA severity or therapy adherence.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with at least moderate OSA were analyzed retrospectively for anthropometric associations and correlations with OSA severity. One group consisted of 48 patients diagnosed using a polygraph, and the other group of 222 patients underwent polysomnography. First, the conventional Cartwright index was used, and a modified index was later applied to integrate the relative time component for REM sleep and the supine position.
RESULTS: Less than a fifth of the patients fulfilled the classic conditions for supine position or REM sleep dependency. There were no definitive cut-offs in the classic or modified Cartwright index with regard to daytime sleepiness. Both indices show there was a correlation between OSA severity and being overweight.
CONCLUSION: The modified Cartwright index allowed us to identify borderline cases that were characterized by a very low or high amount of time spent in the supine position or REM sleep situation. Therapy effects that could have been biased only by varying amounts of time spent in the supine position could be better controlled for. Future studies will possibly include various other ratios besides the previously accepted 2:1 ratio when different statistical parameters are considered, such as the reduction of OSA severity or therapy adherence.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app