JOURNAL ARTICLE

New estimate of valvuloarterial impedance in aortic valve stenosis: A cardiac magnetic resonance study

Gilles Soulat, Nadjia Kachenoura, Emilie Bollache, Ludivine Perdrix, Benoit Diebold, Valentina Zhygalina, Christian Latremouille, Stephane Laurent, Jean-Noel Fabiani, Elie Mousseaux
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: JMRI 2017, 45 (3): 795-803
27696586

PURPOSE: Valvuloarterial impedance (ZVA ), estimating left ventricle (LV) afterload, has been proposed in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as a predictor of mortality in aortic valve stenosis (AVS). However, its calculation differs from arterial characteristic impedance (ZC ). Our aim was to apply the concept of ZC calculation to estimate ZVA from MR with carotid tonometry and to evaluate these indices through their associations with symptoms, LV diastolic function and aortic stiffness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 40 patients with AVS (76 ± 13 years), ZVA-TI derived from velocity time integral and E/Ea were estimated by TTE. ZVA-INS , based on ZC formula, calculated as the instantaneous pressure gradient to peak flow ratio and aortic compliance were estimated by using MRI at 1.5 Tesla.

RESULTS: Both ZVA estimates were higher in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients (707 ± 22 versus 579 ± 53 dyne.s/cm5 , P = 0.031 for ZVA-INS and 4.35 ± 0.16 versus 3.33 ± 0.38 mmHg.m2 /mL, P = 0.018 for ZVA-TI ). Although they were both associated with aortic compliance (r = -0.45; P = 0.006 for ZVA-INS and r = -0.43; P = 0.008 for ZVA-TI ) only ZVA-INS was associated with E/Ea (r = 0.50; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis to identify determinants of E/Ea, a model including age, mean blood pressure, LV ejection fraction, LV mass, and aortic valve area was performed (R2  = 0.41; P < 0.01). When ZVA-INS was added to the model, its overall significance was higher R2  = 0.56 (P < 0.01) and ZVA-INS and LV mass were the only significant determinants.

CONCLUSION: ZVA-INS was more strongly associated with diastolic dysfunction than usual parameters quantifying AVS severity. This new ZVA estimate could improve LV afterload evaluation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:795-803.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
27696586
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"