OPEN IN READ APP
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW

International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma

Shaji Kumar, Bruno Paiva, Kenneth C Anderson, Brian Durie, Ola Landgren, Philippe Moreau, Nikhil Munshi, Sagar Lonial, Joan Bladé, Maria-Victoria Mateos, Meletios Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, Mario Boccadoro, Robert Orlowski, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Andrew Spencer, Jian Hou, Wee Joo Chng, Saad Z Usmani, Elena Zamagni, Kazuyuki Shimizu, Sundar Jagannath, Hans E Johnsen, Evangelos Terpos, Anthony Reiman, Robert A Kyle, Pieter Sonneveld, Paul G Richardson, Philip McCarthy, Heinz Ludwig, Wenming Chen, Michele Cavo, Jean-Luc Harousseau, Suzanne Lentzsch, Jens Hillengass, Antonio Palumbo, Alberto Orfao, S Vincent Rajkumar, Jesus San Miguel, Herve Avet-Loiseau
Lancet Oncology 2016, 17 (8): e328-e346
27511158
Treatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.

Comments

You need to log in or sign up for an account to be able to comment.

No comments yet, be the first to post one!

Related Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
27511158
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"