We have located links that may give you full text access.
Ultra-low-dose chest CT with iterative reconstruction does not alter anatomical image quality.
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 2016 November
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of dose reduction with iterative reconstruction (IR) on image quality of chest CT scan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen human cadavers had chest CT with one reference CT protocol (RP-CT; 120kVp/200mAs) and two protocols with dose reduction: low-dose-CT (LD-CT; 120kVp/40mAs) and ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT; 120kVp/10mAs). Data were reconstructed with filter-back-projection (FBP) for RP-CT and with FBP and IR (sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction [SAFIRE(®)]) algorithm for LD-CT and ULD-CT. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were recorded. The signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios of LD-CT and ULD-CT and quantitative parameters were compared to RP-CT. Two radiologists reviewed the CT examinations assessed independently the quality of anatomical structures and expressed a confidence level using a 2-point scale (50% and 95%).
RESULTS: CTDIvol was 2.69 mGy for LD-CT (-80%; P<0.01) and 0.67 mGy for ULD-CT (-95%; P<0.01) as compared to 13.42 mGy for RP-CT. SNR and CNR were significantly decreased (P<0.01) for LD-CT and ULD-CT, but IR improved these values satisfactorily. No significant differences were observed for quantitative measurements. Radiologists rated excellent/good the RP-CT and LD-CT images, whereas good/fair the ULD-CT images. Confidence level for subjective anatomical analysis was 95% for all protocols.
CONCLUSIONS: Dose reduction with a dose lower than 1 mGy, used in conjunction with IR allows performing chest CT examinations that provide a high quality of anatomical structures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen human cadavers had chest CT with one reference CT protocol (RP-CT; 120kVp/200mAs) and two protocols with dose reduction: low-dose-CT (LD-CT; 120kVp/40mAs) and ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT; 120kVp/10mAs). Data were reconstructed with filter-back-projection (FBP) for RP-CT and with FBP and IR (sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction [SAFIRE(®)]) algorithm for LD-CT and ULD-CT. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were recorded. The signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios of LD-CT and ULD-CT and quantitative parameters were compared to RP-CT. Two radiologists reviewed the CT examinations assessed independently the quality of anatomical structures and expressed a confidence level using a 2-point scale (50% and 95%).
RESULTS: CTDIvol was 2.69 mGy for LD-CT (-80%; P<0.01) and 0.67 mGy for ULD-CT (-95%; P<0.01) as compared to 13.42 mGy for RP-CT. SNR and CNR were significantly decreased (P<0.01) for LD-CT and ULD-CT, but IR improved these values satisfactorily. No significant differences were observed for quantitative measurements. Radiologists rated excellent/good the RP-CT and LD-CT images, whereas good/fair the ULD-CT images. Confidence level for subjective anatomical analysis was 95% for all protocols.
CONCLUSIONS: Dose reduction with a dose lower than 1 mGy, used in conjunction with IR allows performing chest CT examinations that provide a high quality of anatomical structures.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app