We have located links that may give you full text access.
Classifier Model Based on Machine Learning Algorithms: Application to Differential Diagnosis of Suspicious Thyroid Nodules via Sonography.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 2016 October
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to construct classifier models using machine learning algorithms and to evaluate their diagnostic performances for differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 970 histopathologically proven thyroid nodules in 970 patients. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed ultrasound images, and nodules were graded according to a five-tier sonographic scoring system. Statistically significant variables based on an experienced radiologist's observations were obtained with attribute optimization using fivefold cross-validation and applied as the input nodes to build models for predicting malignancy of nodules. The performances of the machine learning algorithms and radiologists were compared using ROC curve analysis.
RESULTS: Diagnosis by the experienced radiologist achieved the highest predictive accuracy of 88.66% with a specificity of 85.33%, whereas the radial basis function (RBF)-neural network (NN) achieved the highest sensitivity of 92.31%. The AUC value for diagnosis by the experienced radiologist (AUC = 0.9135) was greater than those for diagnosis by the less experienced radiologist, the naïve Bayes classifier, the support vector machine, and the RBF-NN (AUC = 0.8492, 0.8811, 0.9033, and 0.9103, respectively; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The machine learning algorithms underperformed with respect to the experienced radiologist's readings used to construct them, and the RBF-NN outperformed the other machine learning algorithm models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 970 histopathologically proven thyroid nodules in 970 patients. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed ultrasound images, and nodules were graded according to a five-tier sonographic scoring system. Statistically significant variables based on an experienced radiologist's observations were obtained with attribute optimization using fivefold cross-validation and applied as the input nodes to build models for predicting malignancy of nodules. The performances of the machine learning algorithms and radiologists were compared using ROC curve analysis.
RESULTS: Diagnosis by the experienced radiologist achieved the highest predictive accuracy of 88.66% with a specificity of 85.33%, whereas the radial basis function (RBF)-neural network (NN) achieved the highest sensitivity of 92.31%. The AUC value for diagnosis by the experienced radiologist (AUC = 0.9135) was greater than those for diagnosis by the less experienced radiologist, the naïve Bayes classifier, the support vector machine, and the RBF-NN (AUC = 0.8492, 0.8811, 0.9033, and 0.9103, respectively; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The machine learning algorithms underperformed with respect to the experienced radiologist's readings used to construct them, and the RBF-NN outperformed the other machine learning algorithm models.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app