We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Intrapatient Comparison of 111In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT and Hybrid 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA PET in Patients With Early Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 2016 September
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection efficiency of In-PSMA-I&T SPECT/CT in comparison to hybrid Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET in patients with early recurrent prostate cancer.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients (mean age, 68.2 ± 6.8 years; range, 52-76 years) with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA; median, 1.03 ng/mL; range, 0.2-7.2ng/mL) and known positive lesions in hybrid Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET scheduled for salvage surgery were included. Whole-body scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed 4 hours after application of 147.0 ± 24.8 MBq (range, 90-183 MBq) In-PSMA I&T. Images were evaluated for suspected lesions, and conspicuity of all lesions was rated using a 4-point-scale (0 = not seen, 1 = retrospectively seen in knowledge of Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET, 2 = low signal, 3 = high signal). Tumor-to-background ratios were determined for SPECT and PET and compared. Tumor-to-background ratio of SPECT was correlated with lesion size as well as patients' Gleason score and PSA level.
RESULTS: In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT detected 14 of 29 PET-positive lesions (48.3%) with no additional lesions identified with In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT. There was a significant weak to moderate correlation of PSA level with tumor-to-background ratio of In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT (correlation coefficient r = 0.6406; 95% confidence interval, 0.1667-0.8741; P = 0.0136). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05), but a weak trend toward a higher detectability in In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT regarding lesion size and initial PSA level.
CONCLUSIONS: In a preselected collective of recurrent prostate cancer patients with low PSA values, In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT showed lower detection rates than hybrid Ga-HBED-CC PSMA PET. However, In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT showed a patient based detection rate of 59%, making it a potentially valuable imaging tool where PET is not available apart from its proven value as a PSMA-targeted probe for radioguided surgery.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients (mean age, 68.2 ± 6.8 years; range, 52-76 years) with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA; median, 1.03 ng/mL; range, 0.2-7.2ng/mL) and known positive lesions in hybrid Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET scheduled for salvage surgery were included. Whole-body scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed 4 hours after application of 147.0 ± 24.8 MBq (range, 90-183 MBq) In-PSMA I&T. Images were evaluated for suspected lesions, and conspicuity of all lesions was rated using a 4-point-scale (0 = not seen, 1 = retrospectively seen in knowledge of Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET, 2 = low signal, 3 = high signal). Tumor-to-background ratios were determined for SPECT and PET and compared. Tumor-to-background ratio of SPECT was correlated with lesion size as well as patients' Gleason score and PSA level.
RESULTS: In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT detected 14 of 29 PET-positive lesions (48.3%) with no additional lesions identified with In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT. There was a significant weak to moderate correlation of PSA level with tumor-to-background ratio of In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT (correlation coefficient r = 0.6406; 95% confidence interval, 0.1667-0.8741; P = 0.0136). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05), but a weak trend toward a higher detectability in In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT regarding lesion size and initial PSA level.
CONCLUSIONS: In a preselected collective of recurrent prostate cancer patients with low PSA values, In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT showed lower detection rates than hybrid Ga-HBED-CC PSMA PET. However, In-PSMA I&T SPECT/CT showed a patient based detection rate of 59%, making it a potentially valuable imaging tool where PET is not available apart from its proven value as a PSMA-targeted probe for radioguided surgery.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app