COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A Biomechanical Comparison of Modified Krackow and Locking Loop Suture Patterns for Soft-Tissue Graft Fixation.

Arthroscopy 2016 July
PURPOSE: The purpose of this ex vivo biomechanical study was to evaluate the tensile mechanical properties of 2 modified suture-graft constructs regarding elongation after pre-tensioning and cyclic loading as well as load to failure.

METHODS: Thirty fresh-frozen porcine Achilles tendons were randomly divided into 2 groups of 15 specimens to assess elongation of the suture-graft construct across 2 different tendon-grasping techniques: a modified locking SpeedWhip (MLS) stitch and a modified Krackow (MK) stitch. Each tendon was pre-tensioned to 89 N for 10 minutes and then cyclically loaded to 200 N for 200 cycles. Finally, each tendon was loaded to failure.

RESULTS: After being pre-tensioned, the MK group elongated significantly more than the MLS group (7.12 ± 0.95 mm v 6.26 ± 0.94 mm, P = .02). Elongation after cyclic loading for the MK and MLS groups was not significantly different (3.39 ± 0.95 mm and 3.21 ± 0.93 mm, respectively; P > .05). The MK group showed a significantly larger load to failure compared with the MLS group (689 ± 61 N v 604 ± 46 N, P = .000024). The mean tendon cross-sectional area was larger in the MK group (399 ± 5 mm(2)v 393 ± 8 mm(2), P = .02), but this difference did not relate to the amount of elongation or load to failure. All but 1 specimen failed by suture breakage at the square knot.

CONCLUSIONS: The MLS and MK stitches, pre-tensioned to 89 N for 10 minutes, both effectively minimized suture-graft construct elongation after cyclic loading. Consequently, both suture patterns are recommended for soft-tissue graft fixation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The MLS and MK suture configurations may provide sufficient biomechanical fixation of the tendon graft in the clinical setting of soft-tissue fixation without an interference screw.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app