COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A pulsatile hemodynamic evaluation of the commercially available bifurcated Y-graft Fontan modification and comparison with the lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduits.

OBJECTIVE: Fontan completion, resulting in a total cavopulmonary connection, is accomplished using a lateral tunnel, extracardiac conduit, or bifurcated Y-graft. The use of Y-grafts is hypothesized to provide symmetric hepatic blood flow distribution to the lungs, a factor related to pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. The present study evaluates the hemodynamic performance of the largest commercially available Y-graft cohort to date, highlights 6 representative cases, and compares commercially available Y-graft performance with lateral tunnel/extracardiac conduit connections.

METHODS: A total of 30 patients with commercially available Y-grafts and 30 patients with lateral tunnel/extracardiac conduits were analyzed. Total cavopulmonary connection anatomies and flow waveforms were reconstructed using cardiac magnetic resonance images and phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed to quantify total cavopulmonary connection power loss, resistance, and hepatic flow distribution. Comparisons between graft types were investigated.

RESULTS: Total cavopulmonary connection resistance was significantly higher for Y-grafts. Hepatic flow distribution was similar overall but showed discrepancies at extreme values with more unbalanced flow in the Y-graft cohort. Power loss was more sensitive to left pulmonary artery stenosis in the Y-graft cohort. Prediction of Y-graft hepatic flow distribution is multifactorial.

CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available Y-grafts do not inherently provide more balanced hepatic flow distribution than lateral tunnel/extracardiac conduit connections, which are more energetically favorable and less sensitive to pulmonary artery stenosis. Graft type should be considered on an individual basis because hemodynamic performance is based on a combination of factors, including pulmonary flow distribution, pulmonary artery stenosis, and superior vena cava positioning.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app