We have located links that may give you full text access.
Lowest Acceptable Bladder Capacity for Interpretation of Uroflowmetry Tests in Children.
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms 2017 September
OBJECTIVE: To determine the age-specific lowest acceptable value of bladder capacity (LABC) for interpretation of uroflowmetry tests in children.
METHODS: From September 2008 through July 2012, healthy children aged 4-9 years were enrolled. All children were asked to have two sets of uroflowmetry and post-void residual (PVR) tests. We selected the tests with lower bladder capacity (voided volume+ PVR) of each child to analyze the LABC. Only bell shaped curves were regarded as normal. PVR >20 mL and Qmax <15 mL/s in children aged 4-6 years, and PVR >10 mL, Qmax <15.0 mL/s in children aged 7-9 years were defined as abnormal, respectively. Receiver operative characteristic curves were used to determine the age-specific cut-off value of LABC. The upper boundary of optimal bladder capacity (OBC) for interpretation of uroflowmetry was defined at 115% expected bladder capacity, and LABC as lower boundary. Linear regression was used to establish the relationship between age and LABC.
RESULTS: Totally, 930 children were eligible for analysis of LABC. Through ROC curve analysis and regression analysis, the best fitted age specific LABC defined though differentiating low Qmax is 52.08 mL + age in years × 4.78 mL. For simplicity, the proposed LABC is age in years × 5 + 50. Good reproducibility of normal flow pattern, Qmax and PVR in each child were observed in the uroflowmetry tests within OBC.
CONCLUSION: Through the large scale study for uroflowmetry tests in children, we proposed the age-specific lowest acceptable bladder capacity for interpretation of uroflowmetry tests as age in years × 5 + 50 mL.
METHODS: From September 2008 through July 2012, healthy children aged 4-9 years were enrolled. All children were asked to have two sets of uroflowmetry and post-void residual (PVR) tests. We selected the tests with lower bladder capacity (voided volume+ PVR) of each child to analyze the LABC. Only bell shaped curves were regarded as normal. PVR >20 mL and Qmax <15 mL/s in children aged 4-6 years, and PVR >10 mL, Qmax <15.0 mL/s in children aged 7-9 years were defined as abnormal, respectively. Receiver operative characteristic curves were used to determine the age-specific cut-off value of LABC. The upper boundary of optimal bladder capacity (OBC) for interpretation of uroflowmetry was defined at 115% expected bladder capacity, and LABC as lower boundary. Linear regression was used to establish the relationship between age and LABC.
RESULTS: Totally, 930 children were eligible for analysis of LABC. Through ROC curve analysis and regression analysis, the best fitted age specific LABC defined though differentiating low Qmax is 52.08 mL + age in years × 4.78 mL. For simplicity, the proposed LABC is age in years × 5 + 50. Good reproducibility of normal flow pattern, Qmax and PVR in each child were observed in the uroflowmetry tests within OBC.
CONCLUSION: Through the large scale study for uroflowmetry tests in children, we proposed the age-specific lowest acceptable bladder capacity for interpretation of uroflowmetry tests as age in years × 5 + 50 mL.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app