COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Microbiome Survey of the Inflamed and Noninflamed Gut at Different Compartments Within the Gastrointestinal Tract of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to contrast the mucosal microbiota in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS: We assessed the concept of localized dysbiosis by comparing the bacterial communities of inflamed and noninflamed mucosa of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and by analysis of the microbiota composition at distinct gut compartments (ileum, cecum, mid-colon, and rectum). We performed 16S rDNA sequencing to analyze population structures. Quality control and operational taxonomic unit classification of reads were performed using mothur with statistical analyses executed in the R package, phyloseq.

RESULTS: There was no variation in any phyla or genera comparing inflamed to noninflamed mucosa within CD (or UC) or when comparing different gut compartments within CD (or UC). There were differences between the inflamed and noninflamed mucosa between CD and UC: analysis of the inflamed IBD gut at the phylum level indicated that Bacteroidetes (P = 0.002) and Fusobacteria (P < 0.05) were detected more frequently in inflamed CD mucosa than in inflamed UC mucosa. Conversely, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes (P < 0.05) were more frequently observed in the inflamed UC mucosa. At the genus level, the abundance of Faecalibacterium (P ≤ 0.05), Bacteroides (P = 0.003), and Pseudomonas (P < 0.001) were significantly different between the inflamed CD and UC and the abundance of 13 genera were significantly different within the noninflamed mucosa. The noninflamed UC mucosa was the most different from non-IBD mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS: Dramatic shifts of microbial communities were not observed between the noninflamed and inflamed mucosa within CD (or UC) although both the inflamed (and noninflamed) mucosa was different between CD and UC.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app