We have located links that may give you full text access.
The Effectiveness of Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Who Have Failed to Respond to Intravitreal Bevacizumab.
PURPOSE: To investigate the response to intravitreal ranibizumab after failure of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
METHODS: Demographics, visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT), and HbA1C were retrospectively collected from DME patients treated with second-line intravitreal ranibizumab at a tertiary hospital in 2012-2013 and followed for at least 3 months.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (26 eyes) were included in the study, with a mean (±SD) age of 66 ± 8.1 years and followed for an average of 28.36 months. The mean number of intravitreal bevacizumab injections was 7.3 ± 2.8, and of intravitreal ranibizumab injections 5.11 ± 2.4. After 3 ranibizumab injections, 57% of eyes showed improvement in VA. The change in VA was statistically significant (p = 0.044) in those eyes where the pretreatment acuity for the second-line therapy was <20/40 (logMAR 0.3). CMT decreased from 435.95 ± 83.28 to 373.69 ± 44.39 µm (p = 0.01). The number of ranibizumab injections was significantly correlated with the change in CMT (p = 0.037).
CONCLUSION: Intravitreal treatment with ranibizumab can be efficacious in eyes with DME that have failed to respond to bevacizumab.
METHODS: Demographics, visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT), and HbA1C were retrospectively collected from DME patients treated with second-line intravitreal ranibizumab at a tertiary hospital in 2012-2013 and followed for at least 3 months.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (26 eyes) were included in the study, with a mean (±SD) age of 66 ± 8.1 years and followed for an average of 28.36 months. The mean number of intravitreal bevacizumab injections was 7.3 ± 2.8, and of intravitreal ranibizumab injections 5.11 ± 2.4. After 3 ranibizumab injections, 57% of eyes showed improvement in VA. The change in VA was statistically significant (p = 0.044) in those eyes where the pretreatment acuity for the second-line therapy was <20/40 (logMAR 0.3). CMT decreased from 435.95 ± 83.28 to 373.69 ± 44.39 µm (p = 0.01). The number of ranibizumab injections was significantly correlated with the change in CMT (p = 0.037).
CONCLUSION: Intravitreal treatment with ranibizumab can be efficacious in eyes with DME that have failed to respond to bevacizumab.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app