We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Prognostic value of the distance between the primary tumor and brainstem in the patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
BMC Cancer 2016 Februrary 18
BACKGROUND: Brainstem dose limitations influence radiation dose reaching to tumor in the patients with locally-advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the prognostic value of the distance between the primary tumor and brainstem (Dbs) in 358 patients with locally-advanced NPC after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the cut-off value to analyze the impact of Dbs on tumor dose coverage and prognosis.
RESULTS: The three-year overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were 88.8 vs. 78.4% (P = 0.007), 96.5 vs. 91.1% (P = 0.018), 87.8 vs. 79.3% (P = 0.067), and 84.1 vs. 69.6% (P = 0.002) for the patients with the Dbs > 4.7 vs. ≤ 4.7 mm, respectively. ROC curves revealed Dbs (4.7 mm) combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T classification had a significantly better prognostic value for OS (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Dbs (≤ 4.7 mm) is an independent negative prognostic factor for OS/LRFS/DFS and enhances the prognostic value of T classification in the patients with locally-advanced NPC.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the prognostic value of the distance between the primary tumor and brainstem (Dbs) in 358 patients with locally-advanced NPC after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the cut-off value to analyze the impact of Dbs on tumor dose coverage and prognosis.
RESULTS: The three-year overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were 88.8 vs. 78.4% (P = 0.007), 96.5 vs. 91.1% (P = 0.018), 87.8 vs. 79.3% (P = 0.067), and 84.1 vs. 69.6% (P = 0.002) for the patients with the Dbs > 4.7 vs. ≤ 4.7 mm, respectively. ROC curves revealed Dbs (4.7 mm) combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T classification had a significantly better prognostic value for OS (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Dbs (≤ 4.7 mm) is an independent negative prognostic factor for OS/LRFS/DFS and enhances the prognostic value of T classification in the patients with locally-advanced NPC.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app