COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Catheter Ablation of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using Electrophysiologically Guided Substrate Modification During Sinus Rhythm After Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

BACKGROUND: The high incidence of postprocedural atrial tachycardia reduces the absolute arrhythmia-free success rate of extensive ablation strategies to treat nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF). We hypothesized that a strategy of targeting low-voltage zones and sites with abnormal electrograms during sinus rhythm (SR-AEs) in the left atrium after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with NPAF is superior.

METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 86 consecutive patients with NPAF were enrolled in study group. After circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation and cardioversion to SR, high-density mapping of left atrium was performed. Areas with low-voltage zone and SR-AE were targeted for further homogenization and elimination, respectively; 78 consecutive sex- and age-matched patients with NPAF who were treated with the stepwise approach served as the historical control group. In the study group, 92% (79/86) were successfully cardioverted after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Among the patients converted to SR, 70% (55/79) had low-voltage zone and SR-AE and received additional ablation, whereas in 30% (24/79) without SR-AE or low-voltage zone, no further ablation was performed. During a follow-up period of >30 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimated probability to maintain SR at 24 months was 69.8% versus 51.3%. And after a single procedure, 3.5% (3/86) developed postprocedural atrial tachycardia in study group, compared with 30% (24/78) in control group (P=0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of selective electrophysiologically guided atrial substrate modification in SR after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation is clinically more effective than the stepwise approach for NPAF ablation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01716143.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app