We have located links that may give you full text access.
Variation and Trends in Anaphylaxis Care in United States Children's Hospitals.
Academic Emergency Medicine 2016 May
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the extent of variation in treatment of children with anaphylaxis.
METHODS: We identified children 1 month to 18 years of age presenting with a primary diagnosis of anaphylaxis to one of the 35 pediatric hospitals included in the Pediatric Health Information System between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2013. We evaluated the variation in use of β2 agonists, glucocorticoids, histamine-1 (H1) antagonists, histamine-2 (H2) antagonists, inhaled epinephrine, intravenous fluids, and oxygen. We assessed whether variation exists in the rates of hospitalization and 3-day emergency department (ED) revisits and whether a temporal trend exists in the ED visit rate for anaphylaxis.
RESULTS: Among 10,351 children with anaphylaxis, the hospital-level median use of common anaphylaxis therapies varied for β2 agonists (22%, interquartile range [IQR] = 16%-26%), glucocorticoids (71%, IQR = 65%-76%), H1 blockers (60%, IQR = 57%-65%), H2 blockers (53%, IQR = 36%-64%), inhaled epinephrine (2.2%, IQR = 1.3%-3.5%), intravenous fluids (26%, IQR = 13%-41%), and oxygen (2.6%, IQR = 0.8%-4.1%). Hospitalization rates ranged from 12% to 95%, with a median rate of 41%. Anaphylaxis diagnoses rose from 5.7 to 11.7 patients per 10,000 ED visits between 2009 and 2013 (p < 0.001 for trend).
CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability in the use of common therapies and hospitalization rates for children cared for in U.S. children's hospitals. Additionally, ED visits for children with anaphylaxis are increasing at U.S. children's hospitals. These findings highlight the need for research defining optimal care for anaphylaxis.
METHODS: We identified children 1 month to 18 years of age presenting with a primary diagnosis of anaphylaxis to one of the 35 pediatric hospitals included in the Pediatric Health Information System between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2013. We evaluated the variation in use of β2 agonists, glucocorticoids, histamine-1 (H1) antagonists, histamine-2 (H2) antagonists, inhaled epinephrine, intravenous fluids, and oxygen. We assessed whether variation exists in the rates of hospitalization and 3-day emergency department (ED) revisits and whether a temporal trend exists in the ED visit rate for anaphylaxis.
RESULTS: Among 10,351 children with anaphylaxis, the hospital-level median use of common anaphylaxis therapies varied for β2 agonists (22%, interquartile range [IQR] = 16%-26%), glucocorticoids (71%, IQR = 65%-76%), H1 blockers (60%, IQR = 57%-65%), H2 blockers (53%, IQR = 36%-64%), inhaled epinephrine (2.2%, IQR = 1.3%-3.5%), intravenous fluids (26%, IQR = 13%-41%), and oxygen (2.6%, IQR = 0.8%-4.1%). Hospitalization rates ranged from 12% to 95%, with a median rate of 41%. Anaphylaxis diagnoses rose from 5.7 to 11.7 patients per 10,000 ED visits between 2009 and 2013 (p < 0.001 for trend).
CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability in the use of common therapies and hospitalization rates for children cared for in U.S. children's hospitals. Additionally, ED visits for children with anaphylaxis are increasing at U.S. children's hospitals. These findings highlight the need for research defining optimal care for anaphylaxis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app