CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, N.I.H., EXTRAMURAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prevention of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Thoracic Surgical Patients: Implementation and Evaluation of a Caprini Risk Assessment Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be a devastating postoperative complication, with about one-third of VTEs occurring post-discharge. We previously retrospectively evaluated the Caprini VTE risk assessment model (RAM) in postoperative lung and esophageal cancer patients, demonstrating that "high risk" patients were more likely to have a postoperative VTE. In this study, we sought to implement the RAM protocol in thoracic surgical patients to evaluate adherence, safety, and VTE outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cohort study at a large safety net hospital included all surgically treated patients within the thoracic surgery division beginning in July 2014. Per RAM protocol, patients with high risk scores were prescribed a total of 30 days of postoperative daily enoxaparin prophylaxis, and moderate risk patients received a total of 10 postoperative days. Adherence and outcome audits were conducted.

RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included for analysis. Provider adherence to RAM score calculation was 99.2% (125 of 126), with appropriate post-discharge prophylaxis prescribed in 96.0% of cases. Twenty-four patients scored high risk (19.2%), 60 were moderate risk (48.0%), and 41 scored low risk (32.8%). Patient adherence to post-discharge enoxaparin prophylaxis was 97.2%. The overall VTE rate was 2.3%, with no post-discharge VTEs or adverse bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a VTE risk assessment protocol with extended course prophylaxis in high risk patients is safe and feasible for providers and thoracic surgical patients at a large safety net institution with a diverse patient population. Follow-up studies are needed to assess efficacy of the RAM in this surgical population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app