JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW

Imaging of the larynx: current concepts

H D Curtin
Radiology 1989, 173 (1): 1-11
2675175
Not every laryngeal abnormality requires imaging. If a lesion is small and there is no evidence of deep extension, the clinician can derive all visual examination. Similarly, when a lesion is large and obviously involves both true and false cords (transglottic), the clinician already knows that a total laryngectomy is necessary and imaging is of little value unless there is a question about nodal involvement. The real value of imaging is in the questionable cases in which a decision must be made about the feasibility of speech conservation therapy. The radiologist must understand the various conservation techniques and the key information needed to determine the feasibility of each. In cases in which patients are able to cooperate with the examination, MR with multiplanar imaging capabilities and increased tissue differentiation has, in my view, an edge over CT. However, many patients cannot cooperate, and in these cases CT provides a more consistently good examination. Some centers rely totally on CT and some rely completely on MR imaging units with low or middle field strength. Either can give excellent laryngeal imaging. At my institution, with a high-field-strength unit, MR imaging is the first choice if the patient is fairly cooperative and is thought able to undergo the examination. Even if the patient cannot tolerate the entire protocol, the examination usually provides enough necessary information. If the patient has major problems with secretions or has difficulty cooperating, we do not try MR imaging but use CT; the examination is almost always adequate even though restricted to one plane. The imaging modality used is less important than the radiologist's knowledge of the key anatomic landmarks. The most important landmarks, from a surgeon's perspective, are the ventricle, anterior commissure, and the cricoid cartilage. The structures most helpful in identifying the position of the ventricle are the paraglottic fat, the thyroarytenoid muscle, and the arytenoid cartilage. The clinician remains responsible for evaluating the mucosal surface. The goal of the radiologic examination is to find deep tumoral extension that the clinician cannot see.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
2675175
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.