Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of response to antibiotic therapy in patients affected by infectious spondylodiscitis.

OBJECTIVE: Spondylodiscitis is characterized by infection involving the intervertebral disc and adjacent vertebrae. It can occur anywhere in the vertebral column but more commonly involves lumbar spine. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET/CT to detect the early response to antibiotic therapy in patients affected by infectious spondylodiscitis and to compare the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in post-treatment evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 patients (12M, 3F), with mean age 65±13 years old, with typical clinical symptoms of Infectious Spondylodiscitis (pain, fever and increase of inflammatory indexes) and confirmed by blood culture or vertebral biopsy underwent within three day-interval a (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Magnetic Resonance (MR) at "baseline" and after antibiotic therapy. Semiquantitative parameters at (18)F-FDG PET/CT "baseline" SUVmax1, MTV1 and TLG1 and after therapy SUVmax2, MTV2 and TLG2 of involved vertebrae were calculated. Follow-up period of at least three months was available for all patients. T-student test for paired groups was performed to compare baseline and after therapy (18)F-FDG PET/CT semiquantitative parameters.

RESULTS: According to (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters all patients showed a response to antibiotic therapy. All patients were positive at "baseline" MRI of the spine, while at follow-up, 7/15 patients showed MR signs of infection and were considered "positive" and 8/15 showed resolution of infectious condition and, therefore they were considered "negative". A statistical significant difference between (18)F-FDG PET/CT "baseline" and after antibiotic therapy was found for all semiquantitative parameters: SUVmax (t=5.8, P=0.01); MTV (t=5.17, P=0.001); TLG (t=5,26, P=0,001). The comparison between the "baseline" and "after treatment" (18)F-FDG semiquantitative parameters showed a significant reduction of all parameters. This reduction was relevant also in patients with positive post-treatment MRI. This can be probably related to the tissue remodeling in the very immediate phase post-treatment, resulted positive at MRI and negative at (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Clinical follow-up of at least three months confirmed these results.

CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDG PET/CT is useful to detect the early response to antibiotic therapy in patients affected by infectious spondylodiscitis. (18)F-FDG PET/CT semiquantitative parameters provide critical diagnostic information of the infectious process. (18)F-FDG PET/CT should be considered as first-line exam in the early post-treatment evaluation of spondylodiscitis while MR should be preferred for delayed assessment.