We have located links that may give you full text access.
Combined Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Sleeve Gastrectomy or Gastric Bypass?-a Controlled Matched Pair Study of 34 Patients.
Obesity Surgery 2016 August
INTRODUCTION: Although all bariatric procedures improve non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in metabolically sick obese patients, it remains unclear whether different procedures achieve similar effects. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB) were compared for their effects on liver function tests (LFT) and glycemic control in a highly selected group of metabolically sick obese patients with both elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), a common marker for NAFLD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODS: Thirty-four obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m(2), ALT > 35 U/L, and T2DM were well-matched from a prospective database and retrospectively analyzed. Seventeen patients each underwent RYGB and SG, respectively. The effects on LFT and glycemic control were evaluated over 12 months.
RESULTS: Both procedures significantly lowered ALT and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) after 12 months, but SG improved both LFT significantly better than RYGB (ALT 17.8 ± 8.8 vs. 31.1 ± 11.2 U/L, p = 0.003; AST 17.0 ± 8.8 vs. 24.3 ± 7.5 U/L, p = 0.004). In contrast to RYGB, SG normalized elevated ALT levels completely (41 vs. 0 %, p = 0.007). Both SG and RYGB improved insulin resistance, glycemic control, and reduced the need of insulin significantly without any difference between the procedures.
CONCLUSION: SG appears to improve LFT better than RYGB in well-matched obese patients with both elevated ALT and T2DM. This suggests that SG may have a better effect on NAFLD than RYGB with similar effects on glycemic control. The present findings should be verified in randomized controlled trials to obtain further evidence for the decision-making on the most appropriate bariatric procedure for metabolically sick patients.
METHODS: Thirty-four obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m(2), ALT > 35 U/L, and T2DM were well-matched from a prospective database and retrospectively analyzed. Seventeen patients each underwent RYGB and SG, respectively. The effects on LFT and glycemic control were evaluated over 12 months.
RESULTS: Both procedures significantly lowered ALT and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) after 12 months, but SG improved both LFT significantly better than RYGB (ALT 17.8 ± 8.8 vs. 31.1 ± 11.2 U/L, p = 0.003; AST 17.0 ± 8.8 vs. 24.3 ± 7.5 U/L, p = 0.004). In contrast to RYGB, SG normalized elevated ALT levels completely (41 vs. 0 %, p = 0.007). Both SG and RYGB improved insulin resistance, glycemic control, and reduced the need of insulin significantly without any difference between the procedures.
CONCLUSION: SG appears to improve LFT better than RYGB in well-matched obese patients with both elevated ALT and T2DM. This suggests that SG may have a better effect on NAFLD than RYGB with similar effects on glycemic control. The present findings should be verified in randomized controlled trials to obtain further evidence for the decision-making on the most appropriate bariatric procedure for metabolically sick patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app