We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Changes in hydration following haemodialysis estimated with bioimpedance spectroscopy.
Nephrology 2016 May
INTRODUCTION: Bioelectrical impedance devices are being more frequently used as an aid to clinical assessment in helping to determine normo-hydrated weight, or target weight for haemodialysis patients. Pre-dialysis measurements are more convenient in clinical practice for patients and staff. We wished to determine the value of pre-dialysis measurements of over-hydration by comparing post-dialysis values with actual weight loss.
METHODS: We measured bioimpedance using bioimpedance spectroscopy pre-dialysis and then post-dialysis.
RESULTS: Bioimpedance spectroscopy was measured pre-dialysis and post-dialysis in 49 haemodialysis patients, 70% male; mean age 63.9 ± 17.9 years. Weight fell from 69.5 ± 17.3 to 67.7 ± 16.9 kg, P < 0.001, with a fall in mean over-hydration (OH) from 2.1 ± 3.4 to 1.3 ± 2.8 L, P < 0.017, and extracellular water (ECW) from 17.0 ± 5.2 to 16.5 ± 5.0 L, P = 0.03. The change in OH underestimated weight change (mean bias -1. 1). Change in OH did not correlate with measured weight loss on univariate analysis (r = 0.26, P = 0.07) but positively correlated with the change in ECW (r = 0.29, P = 0.046) and negatively with intracellular water (r = -0.58, P < 0.001).
SUMMARY: Although more convenient to make bioimpedance measurements of hydration status pre-dialysis, we did not find that changes in OH post-dialysis mirrored the changes in measured weight. As such, single pre-dialysis bioimpedance measurements of hydration status may not accurately predict post-dialysis hydration status.
METHODS: We measured bioimpedance using bioimpedance spectroscopy pre-dialysis and then post-dialysis.
RESULTS: Bioimpedance spectroscopy was measured pre-dialysis and post-dialysis in 49 haemodialysis patients, 70% male; mean age 63.9 ± 17.9 years. Weight fell from 69.5 ± 17.3 to 67.7 ± 16.9 kg, P < 0.001, with a fall in mean over-hydration (OH) from 2.1 ± 3.4 to 1.3 ± 2.8 L, P < 0.017, and extracellular water (ECW) from 17.0 ± 5.2 to 16.5 ± 5.0 L, P = 0.03. The change in OH underestimated weight change (mean bias -1. 1). Change in OH did not correlate with measured weight loss on univariate analysis (r = 0.26, P = 0.07) but positively correlated with the change in ECW (r = 0.29, P = 0.046) and negatively with intracellular water (r = -0.58, P < 0.001).
SUMMARY: Although more convenient to make bioimpedance measurements of hydration status pre-dialysis, we did not find that changes in OH post-dialysis mirrored the changes in measured weight. As such, single pre-dialysis bioimpedance measurements of hydration status may not accurately predict post-dialysis hydration status.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app