JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Individuals with both perceived ankle instability and mechanical laxity demonstrate dynamic postural stability deficits.

Clinical Biomechanics 2015 December
BACKGROUND: Chronic ankle instability is a frequent and serious consequence of lateral ankle sprains. The contribution of perceived instability and potential for mechanical laxity to contribute to the overall deficit in dynamic postural stability is unclear. The purpose was to determine if those with mechanical laxity demonstrated significant differences in dynamic postural stability compared to controls, copers and those with perceived instability.

METHODS: Of 93 participants, 83 recreationally active individuals were divided into 4 groups: controls, copers, those with perceived instability, and those with both perceived instability and mechanical laxity. Injury history and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool were collected, and an instrumented arthrometer was applied. Participants completed a single limb jump landing, balancing upon completion. Ground reaction force data were collected, scaled to body mass, and the Dynamic Postural Stability Indices were calculated for anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, vertical and composite. One-way ANOVAs with Tukey post-hoc tests (α<0.05) were conducted on each of the stability indices among the four groups.

FINDINGS: The mechanically lax group had significantly greater mean (standard deviation) medial-lateral stability index scores 0.57 (0.62) than the coper group 0.24 (0.20; P=0.02) and significantly greater composite index scores 0.73 (0.57) than the perceived instability 0.49 (0.09) and coper groups 0.47 (0.12 P=0.05). No other indices were significantly different among groups.

INTERPRETATION: Individuals with perceived instability and mechanical laxity exhibited dynamic postural deficits compared to copers and those with perceived instability alone. Mechanical laxity may contribute to the deficits in dynamic postural stability.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app