Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Assessment of Abdominal Ultrasound Guidance in Hysteroscopic Metroplasty.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the rates of re-intervention, and immediate and later complications associated with abdominal ultrasound-guided versus unguided hysteroscopic metroplasty in the surgical repair of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynecological Endoscopy class II intrauterine septa.

DESIGN: We performed a large observational retrospective study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2) in a selection of patients who underwent metroplasty in a tertiary university center between 2009 and 2013.

PATIENTS: A total of 108 patients were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were categorized as having abdominal ultrasound-guided metroplasty (n = 46) or unguided metroplasty (n = 62).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected with regard to medical and reproductive histories, diagnosis of septate uterus, surgical procedures, and complications. Using these data, the need for re-intervention and complication rates were compared between groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test. The characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. A persistent septum of >10 mm, defined by 3-dimensional ultrasound hysterosonography, with a need for re-intervention, was found in 16 patients (39.0 %) in the unguided group versus 7 patients (18.4 %) in the ultrasound guidance group (p = .04). Risk of a persistent septum after resection (>10 mm) was reduced with ultrasound guidance (odds ratio = 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.99). Two uterine perforations occurred in our series; both were in the unguided group.

CONCLUSIONS: A systematic abdominal ultrasound-guided metroplasty by hysteroscopy seems to reduce the rates of re-intervention.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app