Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Pneumomediastinum following blunt trauma: Worth an exhaustive workup?

BACKGROUND: Incidental pneumomediastinum is a common radiologic finding following blunt thoracic injury; however, the clinical significance of pneumomediastinum on screening imaging is poorly defined (Curr Probl Surg. 2004;41(3):211-380; Injury. 2010;41(1):40-43). The purpose of this study was to define the incidence of aerodigestive injuries in patients with pneumomediastinum after blunt thoracic and neck injury.

METHODS: After institutional review board approval was obtained, a retrospective review was performed of all patients admitted to Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center with blunt neck and/or thoracic injuries between January 2007 and December 2012. All patients with pneumomediastinum on radiologic investigation were included. Data accrued included demographics, admission clinical data, injury severity patterns, incidence of aerodigestive injuries, operative findings, morbidity, mortality, as well as intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay.

RESULTS: A total of 9,946 patients were included in the study. The predominant mechanism was motor vehicle collision (49%), disproportionately male (76%). Overall, 258 patients (2.6%) had a pneumomediastinum: 65 (25%) and 193 (75%) were diagnosed on a chest x-ray or on a computed tomography (CT) scan, respectively. A total of 21 patients (8.1%) had an aerodigestive workup with bronchoscopy, esophagram, and/or esophagoscopy. Overall, four aerodigestive lesions (1.6%) were diagnosed. Three tracheobronchial injuries were identified on CT scan, and one esophageal injury was diagnosed on an esophagram. Two tracheobronchial injuries required surgery, while the remaining cases were managed nonoperatively. The overall mortality in this cohort was 10.9%.

CONCLUSION: Isolated findings of pneumomediastinum on screening chest x-ray or CT following blunt trauma is a poor predictor of an aerodigestive injury. Highly selective workup in this clinical setting is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app