We have located links that may give you full text access.
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in Norwegian Adults: Discrimination between Female Controls and Eating Disorder Patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) global score to discriminate between female controls and patients by eating disorder (ED) diagnosis, body mass index (BMI) and age.
METHOD: A sample of 1845 control participants and 620 patients from specialty ED treatment centres.
RESULTS: Mean global EDE-Q was 4.00 [standard deviation (SD) = 1.32] for patients and 1.25 (SD = 1.10) for controls. Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.94), with an optimal cut-off score of 2.50 (sensitivity = 0.86; specificity = 0.86), ranging from 2.09 for anorexia nervosa, 2.62 for bulimia nervosa and 2.63 for ED otherwise not specified. Optimal cut-off scores also varied according to BMI, ranging from 1.62 (BMI ≤ 18.0 kg/m(2) ) to 3.26 (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) ), with less variability for age, ranging inversely from 2.16 (>40 years) to 2.70 (<20 years).
DISCUSSION: The global EDE-Q score showed high discriminant validity, and findings illustrate the particular importance of considering BMI and diagnosis when applying cut-offs based upon the EDE-Q.
METHOD: A sample of 1845 control participants and 620 patients from specialty ED treatment centres.
RESULTS: Mean global EDE-Q was 4.00 [standard deviation (SD) = 1.32] for patients and 1.25 (SD = 1.10) for controls. Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.94), with an optimal cut-off score of 2.50 (sensitivity = 0.86; specificity = 0.86), ranging from 2.09 for anorexia nervosa, 2.62 for bulimia nervosa and 2.63 for ED otherwise not specified. Optimal cut-off scores also varied according to BMI, ranging from 1.62 (BMI ≤ 18.0 kg/m(2) ) to 3.26 (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) ), with less variability for age, ranging inversely from 2.16 (>40 years) to 2.70 (<20 years).
DISCUSSION: The global EDE-Q score showed high discriminant validity, and findings illustrate the particular importance of considering BMI and diagnosis when applying cut-offs based upon the EDE-Q.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app