We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Electrocochleography using Transtympanic, Ear Drum and Ear Canal Electrode in Diagnosis of Morbus Menière].
Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie 2015 October
OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to explore the clinical value of non-invasive recordings of electrocochleography in comparison to the use of invasive electrodes for the diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with suspicious Morbus Menière.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 patients with clinical suspicion of Morbus Menière underwent electrocochleography with transtympanic needle-electrode as well as tympanic membrane electrode. 10 patients received electrocochleography with transtympanic needle-electrode and ear canal electrode. A control group of 12 healthy adults was evaluated using tympanic membrane electrode. The negative electrode was placed on the ipsilateral mastoid, the ground electrode in the middle of the forehead. For stimulation broadband click stimulus as well as long tone bursts of 1, 2 and 4 kHz were applied. In addition the impedance of the electrode was registered.
RESULTS: While transtympanic electrocochleography gave reliable results in 100% of these cases, extratympanic recordings often manifested poor wave morphology. The electrocochleographic measures following stimulation with 1 and 2 kHz long tone bursts were the best measures to identify endolymphatic hydrops. This was the case with transtympanic as well as with tympanic membrane electrodes. There was no correlation between impedance and wave morphology.
CONCLUSIONS: For the evaluation of Morbus Menière non-invasive electrocochleography showed good results using a tympanic canal electrode with 1 and 2 kHz tone bursts. Yet in unclear cases transtympanic electrocochleography should be preferred.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 patients with clinical suspicion of Morbus Menière underwent electrocochleography with transtympanic needle-electrode as well as tympanic membrane electrode. 10 patients received electrocochleography with transtympanic needle-electrode and ear canal electrode. A control group of 12 healthy adults was evaluated using tympanic membrane electrode. The negative electrode was placed on the ipsilateral mastoid, the ground electrode in the middle of the forehead. For stimulation broadband click stimulus as well as long tone bursts of 1, 2 and 4 kHz were applied. In addition the impedance of the electrode was registered.
RESULTS: While transtympanic electrocochleography gave reliable results in 100% of these cases, extratympanic recordings often manifested poor wave morphology. The electrocochleographic measures following stimulation with 1 and 2 kHz long tone bursts were the best measures to identify endolymphatic hydrops. This was the case with transtympanic as well as with tympanic membrane electrodes. There was no correlation between impedance and wave morphology.
CONCLUSIONS: For the evaluation of Morbus Menière non-invasive electrocochleography showed good results using a tympanic canal electrode with 1 and 2 kHz tone bursts. Yet in unclear cases transtympanic electrocochleography should be preferred.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app