We have located links that may give you full text access.
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Evaluation of a New Software Version of the RTVue Optical Coherence Tomograph for Image Segmentation and Detection of Glaucoma in High Myopia.
Journal of Glaucoma 2016 June
PURPOSE: To compare the current (6.3) and a novel software version (6.12) of the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph (RTVue-OCT) for ganglion cell complex (GCC) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) image segmentation and detection of glaucoma in high myopia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: RNFLT and GCC scans were acquired with software version 6.3 of the RTVue-OCT on 51 highly myopic eyes (spherical refractive error ≤-6.0 D) of 51 patients, and were analyzed with both the software versions. Twenty-two eyes were nonglaucomatous, 13 were ocular hypertensive and 16 eyes had glaucoma.
RESULTS: No difference was seen for any RNFLT, and average GCC parameter between the software versions (paired t test, P≥0.084). Global loss volume was significantly lower (more normal) with version 6.12 than with version 6.3 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P<0.001). The percentage agreement (κ) between the clinical (normal and ocular hypertensive vs. glaucoma) and the software-provided classifications (normal and borderline vs. outside normal limits) were 0.3219 and 0.4442 for average RNFLT, and 0.2926 and 0.4977 for average GCC with versions 1 and 2, respectively (McNemar symmetry test, P≥0.289). No difference in average RNFLT and GCC classification (McNemar symmetry test, P≥0.727) and the number of eyes with at least 1 segmentation error (P≥0.109) was found between the software versions, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Although GCC segmentation was improved with software version 6.12 compared with the current version in highly myopic eyes, this did not result in a significant change of the average RNFLT and GCC values, and did not significantly improve the software-provided classification for glaucoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: RNFLT and GCC scans were acquired with software version 6.3 of the RTVue-OCT on 51 highly myopic eyes (spherical refractive error ≤-6.0 D) of 51 patients, and were analyzed with both the software versions. Twenty-two eyes were nonglaucomatous, 13 were ocular hypertensive and 16 eyes had glaucoma.
RESULTS: No difference was seen for any RNFLT, and average GCC parameter between the software versions (paired t test, P≥0.084). Global loss volume was significantly lower (more normal) with version 6.12 than with version 6.3 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P<0.001). The percentage agreement (κ) between the clinical (normal and ocular hypertensive vs. glaucoma) and the software-provided classifications (normal and borderline vs. outside normal limits) were 0.3219 and 0.4442 for average RNFLT, and 0.2926 and 0.4977 for average GCC with versions 1 and 2, respectively (McNemar symmetry test, P≥0.289). No difference in average RNFLT and GCC classification (McNemar symmetry test, P≥0.727) and the number of eyes with at least 1 segmentation error (P≥0.109) was found between the software versions, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Although GCC segmentation was improved with software version 6.12 compared with the current version in highly myopic eyes, this did not result in a significant change of the average RNFLT and GCC values, and did not significantly improve the software-provided classification for glaucoma.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app