JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of autopsy reports in terms of preventability of traumatic deaths

Yusuf Emrah Eyi, Mehmet Toygar, Kenan Karbeyaz, Ümit Kaldırım, Salim Kemal Tuncer, Murat Durusu
Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery: TJTES 2015, 21 (2): 127-33
25904274

BACKGROUND: The analysis of autopsy reports plays an important role in the evaluation of trauma care quality. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of preventable deaths and medical errors in regard to the autopsy reports as an indicator of trauma care quality in traumatic deaths.

METHODS: A retrospective review of traumatic autopsy reports kept between 2011 and 2012 in Eskişehir, Turkey was conducted. Demographic data of the cases, injury type, injury mechanism, injury location, ISS values, and cause and place of death were recorded. Deaths were judged in three groups including preventable deaths, potentially preventable deaths and non-preventable deaths. In the definiton of preventability, the criteria of American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma were used. A commission composed of two forensic medicine specialists and one emergency medicine specialist reviewed preventability and defined medical errors.

RESULTS: A total of five hundred and ninety-two autopsy reports were examined in the study period. Trauma was defined as the cause in 65.2% (n=386) of the cases. 81.9% (n=316) of the cases were observed to have suffered blunt injury and 18.1% (n=70) penetrating injury. Death occurred at the scene of trauma in 56.7% (n=219) of the cases, in the pre-hospital period in 11.7% (n=45), and in hospital in 31.6% (n=122). In preventability analysis, it was decided that 4.1% (n=16) of the cases had the properties of being preventable, 14.5% (n=56) potentially preventable and 81.3% (n=314) non-preventable. Suboptimal care was determined in 65.3% (n=47) of the total cases, delayed intervention in 58.3% (n=42), error in the medical method decision in 8.3% (n=6), delayed or wrong diagnosis in 1.4% (n=1), and inappropriate or incorrect medical application in 1.4% (n=1).

CONCLUSION: High rates of preventable deaths in the pre-hospital period, in cases of penetrating injuries, and particularly in cases of chest trauma were evaluated as noteworthy findings. Integrated working of pre-hospital emergency healthcare services with trauma centres would enable the development of trauma care and reduce the rates of preventable deaths.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
25904274
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"