We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
REVIEW
Effect of ultrafiltration versus intravenous furosemide for decompensated heart failure in cardiorenal syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Nephron 2015
BACKGROUND: Ultrafiltration is an adjunctive treatment for decompensated heart failure patients with cardiorenal syndrome. The efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration in the patient cohort are still unknown.
METHODS: We systematically reviewed and evaluated randomized controlled trials, comparing diuretics with ultrafiltration in adult patients with decompensated heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome through January 2014. The primary outcomes were body weight loss and total fluid removal.
RESULTS: We identified 8 trials including 608 patients. In a random-effects model, the pooled difference of body weight loss was 1.44 kg between patients receiving ultrafiltration and diuretics (95% CI, 0.29-2.59; p = 0.01). The difference of fluid removal was 1.28 l between groups (95% CI, 0.43-2.12; p = 0.003). The RR for mortality was 0.90 for ultrafiltration compared with diuretics (95% CI, 0.61-1.33; p = 0.60) and the RR for renal function deterioration was 1.29 (95% CI, 0.90-1.85; p = 0.17). There is a trend toward reducing readmission rate in ultrafiltration group.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrafiltration is a safe and effective strategy in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome without increasing the risk of renal deterioration.
METHODS: We systematically reviewed and evaluated randomized controlled trials, comparing diuretics with ultrafiltration in adult patients with decompensated heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome through January 2014. The primary outcomes were body weight loss and total fluid removal.
RESULTS: We identified 8 trials including 608 patients. In a random-effects model, the pooled difference of body weight loss was 1.44 kg between patients receiving ultrafiltration and diuretics (95% CI, 0.29-2.59; p = 0.01). The difference of fluid removal was 1.28 l between groups (95% CI, 0.43-2.12; p = 0.003). The RR for mortality was 0.90 for ultrafiltration compared with diuretics (95% CI, 0.61-1.33; p = 0.60) and the RR for renal function deterioration was 1.29 (95% CI, 0.90-1.85; p = 0.17). There is a trend toward reducing readmission rate in ultrafiltration group.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrafiltration is a safe and effective strategy in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome without increasing the risk of renal deterioration.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app