We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Individualized reduction of radiation dose with a chest circumference-adapted technique and iterative reconstructions in 256-slice retrospective and prospective ECG-triggered computed tomography coronary angiography.
Coronary Artery Disease 2015 June
PURPOSE: To assess the impact of chest circumference (CC)-adjusted tube current and iterative reconstructions (iDose) on individualized radiation dose reduction and image quality (IQ) in ECG-triggered computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 102 patients underwent retrospectively ECG-triggered CTCA utilizing CC-adapted tube current [mAs=1000×(0.051×CC-23.765)/900] and filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction (group A). On the basis of the CC-adjusted tube current technique, 54 patients (group B) underwent retrospective ECG-triggered CTCA with a 20% mAs reduction compared with group A and 90 patients (group C) underwent prospective ECG-triggered CTCA with an 80% mAs reduction compared with group A; both groups B and C were reconstructed with FBP and iDose. Subjective IQ was assessed, and image noise, signal-to-noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) were quantified.
RESULTS: Patients in group A had the highest radiation dose, followed by group B and group C. iDose provided decreased image noise and increased SNR and CNR, as did subjective IQ. The image noise was higher and SNR and CNR in group B were obviously lower than those in group A with FBP, but in group B, iDose4 increased the mean objective IQ. There was no difference between group B with iDose and group A with FBP, as was the case with subjective IQ.
CONCLUSION: The combination of a CC-adapted technique, prospective triggering, and partial iterative reconstruction techniques reduces the radiation dose significantly, without significant degradation of IQ.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 102 patients underwent retrospectively ECG-triggered CTCA utilizing CC-adapted tube current [mAs=1000×(0.051×CC-23.765)/900] and filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction (group A). On the basis of the CC-adjusted tube current technique, 54 patients (group B) underwent retrospective ECG-triggered CTCA with a 20% mAs reduction compared with group A and 90 patients (group C) underwent prospective ECG-triggered CTCA with an 80% mAs reduction compared with group A; both groups B and C were reconstructed with FBP and iDose. Subjective IQ was assessed, and image noise, signal-to-noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) were quantified.
RESULTS: Patients in group A had the highest radiation dose, followed by group B and group C. iDose provided decreased image noise and increased SNR and CNR, as did subjective IQ. The image noise was higher and SNR and CNR in group B were obviously lower than those in group A with FBP, but in group B, iDose4 increased the mean objective IQ. There was no difference between group B with iDose and group A with FBP, as was the case with subjective IQ.
CONCLUSION: The combination of a CC-adapted technique, prospective triggering, and partial iterative reconstruction techniques reduces the radiation dose significantly, without significant degradation of IQ.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app