JOURNAL ARTICLE

Change in novel filtration markers and risk of ESRD

Casey M Rebholz, Morgan E Grams, Kunihiro Matsushita, Elizabeth Selvin, Josef Coresh
American Journal of Kidney Diseases: the Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2015, 66 (1): 47-54
25542414

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease progression is a risk factor for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A 57% decline in creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcr) is an established surrogate outcome for ESRD in clinical trials, and a 30% decrease recently has been proposed as a surrogate end point. However, it is unclear whether change in novel filtration marker levels provides additional information for ESRD risk to change in eGFRcr.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study participants from 4 US communities.

PREDICTORS: Percent change in levels of filtration markers (eGFRcr, cystatin C-based eGFR [eGFRcys], the inverse of β2-microglobulin concentration [1/B2M]) over a 6-year period.

OUTCOME: Incident ESRD.

MEASUREMENTS: Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for demographics, kidney disease risk factors, and first measurement of eGFRcr.

RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 13 years, there were 142 incident ESRD cases. In adjusted analysis, declines > 30% in eGFRcr, eGFRcys, and 1/B2M were associated significantly with ESRD compared with stable concentrations of filtration markers (HRs of 19.96 [95% CI, 11.73-33.96], 16.67 [95% CI, 10.27-27.06], and 22.53 [95% CI, 13.20-38.43], respectively). Using the average of declines in the 3 markers, >30% decline conferred higher ESRD risk than that for eGFRcr alone (HR, 31.97 [95% CI, 19.40-52.70; P=0.03] vs eGFRcr).

LIMITATIONS: Measurement error could influence estimation of change in filtration marker levels.

CONCLUSIONS: A >30% decline in kidney function assessed using novel filtration markers is associated strongly with ESRD, suggesting the potential utility of measuring change in cystatin C and B2M levels in settings in which improved outcome ascertainment is needed, such as clinical trials.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
25542414
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"