JOURNAL ARTICLE

Continuous glucose monitoring and its relationship to hemoglobin A1c and oral glucose tolerance testing in obese and prediabetic youth

Christine L Chan, Laura Pyle, Lindsey Newnes, Kristen J Nadeau, Philip S Zeitler, Megan M Kelsey
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2015, 100 (3): 902-10
25532041

CONTEXT: The optimal screening test for diabetes and prediabetes in obese youth is controversial.

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is a better predictor of free-living glycemia as measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study of youth 10-18 years old, body mass index (BMI) 85th percentile or greater, with diabetes risk factors.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 118) with BMI 85th percentile or greater, not on medications for glucose management, were recruited from primary care and pediatric endocrinology clinics around Denver, Colorado.

INTERVENTION: HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 2-hour glucose were collected and all participants wore a blinded CGM for 72 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CGM outcomes were determined and descriptive statistics calculated. Performance characteristics at current American Diabetes Association cutpoints were compared with CGM outcomes.

RESULTS: CGM data were successfully collected on 98 obese youth. Those with prediabetes had significantly higher average glucose, area under the curve (AUC), peak glucose, and time greater than 120 and greater than 140 mg/dL (P < .01) on CGM than youth with normal HbA1c or OGTT. HbA1c had a greater magnitude of correlation to CGM average glucose, AUC, and minimum glucose; 2-hour glucose had a greater magnitude of correlation to CGM SD, peak glucose, and time greater than 140 and greater than 200 mg/dL. However, there were no overall differences in the strength comparisons between 2-hour glucose and HbA1c correlations to CGM outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: In obese youth, HbA1c and 2-hour glucose performed equally well at predicting free-living glycemia on CGM, suggesting that both are valid tests for dysglycemia screening.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
25532041
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"