We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Does laparoscopy-aided gastrostomy placement improve or worsen gastroesophageal reflux in patients with neurological impairment?
Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2014 December
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate whether laparoscopy-aided gastrostomy placement (LGP) improved or worsened gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in neurological impairment (NI) patients.
METHODS: Subjects included 26 NI patients nourished via nasogastric tubes (age, 1-17years; median, 6years). They were divided into groups based on the percentage of time with an esophageal pH <4.0 (reflux index: RI) before LGP: Group 1 (GI, n=13), RI <5.0%; Group II (GH, n=13), RI ≥5.0%. Acid/nonacid reflux episodes (RE) were evaluated using combined pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance (pH-MII) monitoring, and gastric emptying was measured with the C breath test before and after LGP.
RESULTS: RI and number of RE evaluated with pH analyses and number of total/acid distal and proximal bolus RE with pH-MH increased significantly in GI. RI and acid clearance time with pH analyses and number of total bolus RE with pH-MII decreased significantly in GH. Gastric emptying parameters did not change significantly in GI, whereas the half-gastric emptying time and gastric emptying coefficient improved significantly in GH.
CONCLUSION: LGP reduces GER in NI patients with pathological GER by improving gastric emptying, although it has a paradoxical influence on those without pathological GER.
METHODS: Subjects included 26 NI patients nourished via nasogastric tubes (age, 1-17years; median, 6years). They were divided into groups based on the percentage of time with an esophageal pH <4.0 (reflux index: RI) before LGP: Group 1 (GI, n=13), RI <5.0%; Group II (GH, n=13), RI ≥5.0%. Acid/nonacid reflux episodes (RE) were evaluated using combined pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance (pH-MII) monitoring, and gastric emptying was measured with the C breath test before and after LGP.
RESULTS: RI and number of RE evaluated with pH analyses and number of total/acid distal and proximal bolus RE with pH-MH increased significantly in GI. RI and acid clearance time with pH analyses and number of total bolus RE with pH-MII decreased significantly in GH. Gastric emptying parameters did not change significantly in GI, whereas the half-gastric emptying time and gastric emptying coefficient improved significantly in GH.
CONCLUSION: LGP reduces GER in NI patients with pathological GER by improving gastric emptying, although it has a paradoxical influence on those without pathological GER.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app