We have located links that may give you full text access.
Utility of sentinel node biopsy in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2015 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Currently there is no consensual agreement on the standard use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) in staging of high-risk patients.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to define the predictive value and role of SLNB combined with the different high-risk factors to determine which patients could benefit from SLNB.
METHOD: We conducted a review of the literature on cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and SLNB published in the year 2000 until May 2012. 173 patients with SCC tumors and SLNB were found. Risk factors were listed along with lymph node status. Sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the cumulative results for each risk factor.
RESULTS: Sensitivity for the total cohort was 79%, specificity was 100% and negative predictive value was 96%. The sensitivity, specificity and NPV were 78.26%, 100% and 95.14%, respectively, for tumor size >2 cm. Sensitivity, specificity and NPV for a tumor localized at a high-risk area were 72.63%, 100% and 96.74%, respectively. Specificity was 100% as was NPV for immunosuppression.
CONCLUSION: SLNB has a high NPV and low false negative rate and carries a low risk of complications. SLNB may prove to enhance the survival or aid the prognosis of high-risk cSCC. Further, detailed investigations and longer follow-up times are needed to define the right group of patients that could benefit from this procedure.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to define the predictive value and role of SLNB combined with the different high-risk factors to determine which patients could benefit from SLNB.
METHOD: We conducted a review of the literature on cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and SLNB published in the year 2000 until May 2012. 173 patients with SCC tumors and SLNB were found. Risk factors were listed along with lymph node status. Sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the cumulative results for each risk factor.
RESULTS: Sensitivity for the total cohort was 79%, specificity was 100% and negative predictive value was 96%. The sensitivity, specificity and NPV were 78.26%, 100% and 95.14%, respectively, for tumor size >2 cm. Sensitivity, specificity and NPV for a tumor localized at a high-risk area were 72.63%, 100% and 96.74%, respectively. Specificity was 100% as was NPV for immunosuppression.
CONCLUSION: SLNB has a high NPV and low false negative rate and carries a low risk of complications. SLNB may prove to enhance the survival or aid the prognosis of high-risk cSCC. Further, detailed investigations and longer follow-up times are needed to define the right group of patients that could benefit from this procedure.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app