Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies and risk of subsequent adverse obstetric outcomes in women with prior pregnancy loss.

The reported prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in women with a chief complaint of pregnancy loss varies, as does the risk of adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. Our objectives were to assess the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies meeting revised Sapporo thresholds among women presenting with a chief complaint of pregnancy loss and risks in subsequent pregnancies for these women. We examined a retrospective cohort of patients presenting with a chief complaint of pregnancy loss between 2003 and 2012. Antiphospholipid antibodies were assessed at the providers' discretion, and patients were considered positive if they met the revised Sapporo criteria. Patient data were obtained by review of the medical records. 338/390 women (86.7%) presented with a chief complaint of pregnancy loss and had testing for antiphospholipid antibodies. 19/338 women (5.6%) persistently tested positive for at least one antiphospholipid antibody. Seven women who tested positive had isolated recurrent early pregnancy loss ≤10 weeks, and 12 women who tested positive had venous thromboembolism (VTE), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), delivery <34 weeks for pre-eclampsia, and/or placental insufficiency, or fetal demise >10 weeks. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes were available for 13 patients. Compared with women with recurrent early pregnancy loss alone, subsequent obstetric morbidity was significantly more likely in those patients with a history of SLE and/or VTE (p=0.048). We conclude that the prevalence of positive antiphospholipid antibodies in women with a chief complaint of pregnancy loss and without autoimmune disease or prior thrombosis is low and that among these women, subsequent pregnancy outcomes are largely favorable.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app