We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
GFR decline and subsequent risk of established kidney outcomes: a meta-analysis of 37 randomized controlled trials.
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2014 December
BACKGROUND: The currently established end points for clinical trials of progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are end-stage renal disease and doubling of serum creatinine level, which approximates a 57% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There is increased interest in using alternative end points in clinical trials to shorten trial duration and reduce sample size. As part of an evaluation of using lesser declines in GFR as alternative end points, we examined the associations of various levels of eGFR decline with the subsequent development of established end points and assess the consistency of alternate levels of eGFR decline across varying clinical manifestations of kidney disease and interventions.
STUDY DESIGN: Observational analysis of randomized controlled trials.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 9,488 participants in 37 randomized controlled trials in CKD.
PREDICTOR: Alternative end points, defined as 30% and 40% declines in eGFR from baseline to month 12. Effect modification by baseline eGFR, proteinuria, cause of disease, and interventions.
OUTCOMES: Established end point, defined as end-stage renal disease, eGFR<15mL/min/1.73m(2), or doubling of serum creatinine level.
RESULTS: From baseline to 12 months, 16.1% and 7.8% of participants had eGFR declines of ≥30% or ≥40%, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 2.0 (IQR, 1.2-3.1) years after the 12-month baseline period, 2,661 established end points were observed. A strong linear association was observed between eGFR decline and subsequent established end points. HRs for the established end point for 30% and 40% decreases in eGFR compared to a 0% decline were 9.6 (95% CI, 7.3-12.6) and 20.3 (95% CI, 14.1-29.3), respectively. The associations were consistent regardless of baseline eGFR, proteinuria, causes of disease, and interventions.
LIMITATIONS: Observational study subject to residual confounding.
CONCLUSIONS: The strong associations between lesser declines in eGFR and the subsequent development of established end points were consistent across different clinical characteristics of kidney disease and interventions and support implementation of alternative end points in clinical trials of CKD progression.
STUDY DESIGN: Observational analysis of randomized controlled trials.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 9,488 participants in 37 randomized controlled trials in CKD.
PREDICTOR: Alternative end points, defined as 30% and 40% declines in eGFR from baseline to month 12. Effect modification by baseline eGFR, proteinuria, cause of disease, and interventions.
OUTCOMES: Established end point, defined as end-stage renal disease, eGFR<15mL/min/1.73m(2), or doubling of serum creatinine level.
RESULTS: From baseline to 12 months, 16.1% and 7.8% of participants had eGFR declines of ≥30% or ≥40%, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 2.0 (IQR, 1.2-3.1) years after the 12-month baseline period, 2,661 established end points were observed. A strong linear association was observed between eGFR decline and subsequent established end points. HRs for the established end point for 30% and 40% decreases in eGFR compared to a 0% decline were 9.6 (95% CI, 7.3-12.6) and 20.3 (95% CI, 14.1-29.3), respectively. The associations were consistent regardless of baseline eGFR, proteinuria, causes of disease, and interventions.
LIMITATIONS: Observational study subject to residual confounding.
CONCLUSIONS: The strong associations between lesser declines in eGFR and the subsequent development of established end points were consistent across different clinical characteristics of kidney disease and interventions and support implementation of alternative end points in clinical trials of CKD progression.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app