We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Feasibility and efficacy of percutaneously delivered leadless cardiac pacing in an in vivo ovine model.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 2015 March
INTRODUCTION: In this in vivo ovine study, we describe the course of pacing and sensing parameters during follow-up as well as the gross and histopathological features at the implant site of the recently described leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP).
METHODS AND RESULTS: All sheep underwent LCP implantation in the right ventricular (RV) apex. Serial pacing/sensing thresholds were assessed. In the first cohort, 11 animals were followed up for a period of 3 months, followed by necropsy. In the second cohort, 7 additional sheep were followed for a period of up to 18 months. Mean pacing and sensing thresholds in the 3-month cohort were 1.0 ± 0.5 V and 9.0 ± 3.7 mV at implant, and 0.7 ± 0.2 V and 8.1 ± 3.9 mV at 90 days, respectively. At necropsy at 3 months, all devices were securely implanted at the RV apex without extrusion of helix beyond the RV wall. Besides endocardial reactive changes in the RV apex surrounding the distal portion of the LCP, there were no other grossly visible abnormalities. In the second cohort (7 sheep), mean pacing and sensing thresholds were 1.0 ± 0.5 V and 9.9 ± 3.8 mV at implant, and 0.86 ± 0.4 V and 4.25 ± 1 mV, respectively, at 18 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that after implantation of the LCP, pacing/sensing parameters remain adequate up to 18 months in follow-up. In addition, pathological changes at the implant site and within the RV are limited in severity at 90 days, supporting the efficacy and safety of this novel approach to pacing.
METHODS AND RESULTS: All sheep underwent LCP implantation in the right ventricular (RV) apex. Serial pacing/sensing thresholds were assessed. In the first cohort, 11 animals were followed up for a period of 3 months, followed by necropsy. In the second cohort, 7 additional sheep were followed for a period of up to 18 months. Mean pacing and sensing thresholds in the 3-month cohort were 1.0 ± 0.5 V and 9.0 ± 3.7 mV at implant, and 0.7 ± 0.2 V and 8.1 ± 3.9 mV at 90 days, respectively. At necropsy at 3 months, all devices were securely implanted at the RV apex without extrusion of helix beyond the RV wall. Besides endocardial reactive changes in the RV apex surrounding the distal portion of the LCP, there were no other grossly visible abnormalities. In the second cohort (7 sheep), mean pacing and sensing thresholds were 1.0 ± 0.5 V and 9.9 ± 3.8 mV at implant, and 0.86 ± 0.4 V and 4.25 ± 1 mV, respectively, at 18 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that after implantation of the LCP, pacing/sensing parameters remain adequate up to 18 months in follow-up. In addition, pathological changes at the implant site and within the RV are limited in severity at 90 days, supporting the efficacy and safety of this novel approach to pacing.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app