Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Clostridium difficile strains belonging to different polymerase chain reaction ribotypes isolated in Poland in 2012.

Anaerobe 2015 Februrary
In the beginning of 2012, a study was conducted to obtain an overview of Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) in Polish hospitals. The collection of 83 toxigenic C. difficile isolates obtained from this hospital-based survey was used to identify antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Among the C. difficile isolates analyzed, 48 (57.8%) belonged to PCR ribotype 027, 21 (25.3%) to its closely related PCR ribotype 176, and 14 (16.9%) to different PCR ribotypes. Seventy one (85.5%) isolates were resistant to erythromycin, whereas 23 (27.7%) had high-level clindamycin resistance, having minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) greater than 256 mg/L. All strains were ciprofloxacin resistant and 69 (83.1%) were moxifloxacin resistant. Seventy-three (87.9%) strains were imipenem resistant, but only 2 (2.4%) strains were resistant to tetracycline. All strains were sensitive to tigecycline. Metronidazole and vancomycin were generally effective against the C. difficile isolates, both having an MIC90 value of 0.75 mg/L. Isolates belonging to PCR ribotype 027 and the closely related PCR ribotype 176, showed higher resistance. All ribotype 027 and 176 C. difficile isolates demonstrated high-level resistance to erythromycin (MIC ≥ 256 mg/L), and 95,2% of ribotype 176 isolates were co-resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin. The MIC of moxifloxacin for this epidemic strain was very high (≥32 mg/L). Resistance to erythromycin, moxifloxacin, and rifampicin was observed in 15 (18%) of the isolates, all of which belonged to PCR ribotype 027. Multidrug resistance (MDR), defined as resistance at least to three classes of antimicrobial agents was observed in 85.5% (n = 71) of toxigenic C. difficile strains.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app