JOURNAL ARTICLE

Efficacy of β blockers in patients with heart failure plus atrial fibrillation: an individual-patient data meta-analysis

Dipak Kotecha, Jane Holmes, Henry Krum, Douglas G Altman, Luis Manzano, John G F Cleland, Gregory Y H Lip, Andrew J S Coats, Bert Andersson, Paulus Kirchhof, Thomas G von Lueder, Hans Wedel, Giuseppe Rosano, Marcelo C Shibata, Alan Rigby, Marcus D Flather
Lancet 2014 December 20, 384 (9961): 2235-43
25193873

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation and heart failure often coexist, causing substantial cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. β blockers are indicated in patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; however, the efficacy of these drugs in patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation is uncertain. We therefore meta-analysed individual-patient data to assess the efficacy of β blockers in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm compared with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS: We extracted individual-patient data from ten randomised controlled trials of the comparison of β blockers versus placebo in heart failure. The presence of sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation was ascertained from the baseline electrocardiograph. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat. Outcome data were meta-analysed with an adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression. The study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT0083244, and PROSPERO, number CRD42014010012.

FINDINGS: 18,254 patients were assessed, and of these 13,946 (76%) had sinus rhythm and 3066 (17%) had atrial fibrillation at baseline. Crude death rates over a mean follow-up of 1·5 years (SD 1·1) were 16% (2237 of 13,945) in patients with sinus rhythm and 21% (633 of 3064) in patients with atrial fibrillation. β-blocker therapy led to a significant reduction in all-cause mortality in patients with sinus rhythm (hazard ratio 0·73, 0·67-0·80; p<0·001), but not in patients with atrial fibrillation (0·97, 0·83-1·14; p=0·73), with a significant p value for interaction of baseline rhythm (p=0·002). The lack of efficacy for the primary outcome was noted in all subgroups of atrial fibrillation, including age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, heart rate, and baseline medical therapy.

INTERPRETATION: Based on our findings, β blockers should not be used preferentially over other rate-control medications and not regarded as standard therapy to improve prognosis in patients with concomitant heart failure and atrial fibrillation.

FUNDING: Menarini Farmaceutica Internazionale (administrative support grant).

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Responses

Sort by: Most RecentHighest Rated

Paulo Salim

Very good

6

R M

Ok
I don't have acess to full text, but I would like to know about b.blocks used in the study ??

3

Cinzia Barletta

What kind of b blocks were used?

1

Remo Morelli

I'm not sure the conclusion is a just one, as no mention is made as to what is a better treatment for AV nodal blockade in pts with CHF and AF.

0

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
25193873
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"